6,681
edits
Changes
no edit summary
[[Artemis Internet]], the applicant for [[.secure]], held a day-long conference in San Francisco in August 2013 to discuss the Names Collision issue. Delegates from [[Google]] and [[Paypal]] were listed as panelists.
[[Artemis Internet]], the applicant for [[.secure]], held a day-long conference in San Francisco in August 2013 to discuss the Names Collision issue. Delegates from [[Google]] and [[Paypal]] were listed as panelists.
New gTLD Applicants also organized a conference on 01 Oct 2013 in Washington, D.C. Titled the TLD Security Forum, the event hosted a number of panelists and speakers, notably [[Steve Crocker]]. The afternoon sessions included some fierce debate as NTAG members clashed with representatives from [[ANA]].<ref>[http://domainincite.com/14569-crocker-to-speak-at-second-gtld-collisions-summit Crocker to Speak at Second gTLD Collisions Summit, DomainIncite] Retrieved 17 Feb 2014</ref><ref>[http://www.tldsecurity.net/live-stream.html Live Stream, TLD Security Forum] Retrieved 18 Feb 2014</ref> ANA vice president [[Dan Jaffe]] and legal council [[Amy Mushahwar]] presented a session in the afternoon that had many New gTLD applicants, most notably [[Alex Stamos]] and [[Jeff Neuman]], arguing against them in the Q&A portion of the session. The ANA delegates raised concerns that they needed more than a month-long comment period to go over the data from the Interisle report and reach some conclusions as to the risk that Name Collisions might have once New gTLDs are delegated.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/14592-angry-gtld-applicants-lay-into-ana-and-verisign-bullshit Angry gTLD Applicants Lay into ANA and Verisign "Bullshit", DomainIncite] Retrieved 18 Feb 2014</ref>
New gTLD Applicants also organized a conference on 01 Oct 2013 in Washington, D.C. Titled the TLD Security Forum, the event hosted a number of panelists and speakers, notably [[Steve Crocker]]. The afternoon sessions included some fierce debate as NTAG members clashed with representatives from [[ANA]].<ref>[http://domainincite.com/14569-crocker-to-speak-at-second-gtld-collisions-summit Crocker to Speak at Second gTLD Collisions Summit, DomainIncite] Retrieved 17 Feb 2014</ref><ref>[http://www.tldsecurity.net/live-stream.html Live Stream, TLD Security Forum] Retrieved 18 Feb 2014</ref> ANA vice president [[Dan Jaffe]] and legal council [[Amy Mushahwar]] presented a session in the afternoon that had many New gTLD applicants, most notably [[Alex Stamos]] of [[Artemis Internet]] and [[Jeff Neuman]] of [[Neustar]], arguing against them in the Q&A portion of the session. The ANA delegates raised concerns that they needed more than a month-long comment period to go over the data from the Interisle report and reach some conclusions as to the risk that Name Collisions might have once New gTLDs are delegated.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/14592-angry-gtld-applicants-lay-into-ana-and-verisign-bullshit Angry gTLD Applicants Lay into ANA and Verisign "Bullshit", DomainIncite] Retrieved 18 Feb 2014</ref>
===Proposed Solutions===
===Proposed Solutions===
Many solutions to the Name Collision issue were proposed by ICANN, TLD applicants, and the community at large. The initial proposal by ICANN that immediately followed the release of Interisle's report, was to delay the delegation of a portion of the strings
Many solutions to the Name Collision issue were proposed by ICANN, TLD applicants, and the community at large. The initial proposal by ICANN that immediately followed the release of Interisle's report, was to delay the delegation of a portion of the strings that were of uncalculated risk, as explained above.
A number of New gTLD applicants proposed alternative approaches to "mitigation" of the name collision issue. [[Neustar]] conducted its own analysis of the data in the Interisle report, and suggested evaluating domains of "
==Research==
==Research==