3,197
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 870:
Line 870: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→Summary Table of Requests
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2019-03-14-en#2.d Denied by resolution]
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2019-03-14-en#2.d Denied by resolution]
|
|
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-16-6-dotkids-request-2016-05-06-en 16-6:] DotKids Foundation
| DotKids did not prevail in its [[CPE]] for [[.kids]]
| No*
| Deny
| No action taken
| No proper grounds for reconsideration
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-16-7-dotmusic-request-2016-06-08-en 16-7:] [[DotMusic Limited]]
| Requesting reconsideration of staff response to DotMusic's [[Document Information Disclosure Process|DIDP]] request regarding the determination of DotMusic's [[Community Priority Evaluation]] of [[.music]]
| No*
| Deny
| No action taken
| No proper grounds for reconsideration
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-16-8-cpa-australia-request-2016-07-18-en 16-8:] CPA Australia Ltd.
| CPA Australia did not prevail in its [[Community Priority Evaluation]] for [[.cpa]]
| No
| Deny
| No action taken
| RR was withdrawn after the BAMC's recommendation was published
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-16-9-ruby-glen-radix-request-2016-07-18-en 16-9:] Ruby Glen, LLC and Radix FZC
| Urgent reconsideration request regarding ICANN staff's refusal to halt the [[.web]] [[Auctions of Last Resort|auction]] based on leadership changes at another applicant & auction participant
| No*
| Deny
| No action taken
| No proper grounds for reconsideration
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-16-10-rysg-request-2016-08-11-en 16-10:] [[Registries Stakeholder Group]]
| ICANN policy implementation guidance to registries that "improperly conflated" a Consistent Labeling and Display (CL&D) Policy with [[RDAP]]
| Withdrawn
| No recommendation
| No action taken
| Withdrawn by RySG prior to any action
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-16-11-trs-et-al-request-2016-08-25-en 16-11:] Travel Reservations SRL; Spring McCook, LLC; Minds + Machines Group Limited; Famous Four Media Limited; dot Hotel Limited; Radix FCZ; dot Hotel Inc.; and Fegistry, LLC
| Board acceptance of Hotel Top-Level Domain S.a.r.l.'s successful [[Community Priority Evaluation]] for [[.hotel]] and instruction to staff to move forward was discriminatory to requesters (who were the other applicants), and invalid for other reasons
| No
| Deny
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2019-01-27-en#2.f Denied by resolution]
|
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-16-12-merck-kgaa-request-2016-08-25-en 16-12]: Merck KGaA
| Requester did not prevail in its [[Community Priority Evaluation]] for [[.merck]]
| No
| Deny
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2019-01-27-en#2.h Denied by resolution]
|
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-16-13-merck-kgaa-request-2016-09-28-en 16-13:] Merck KGaA
| Merck's application for merck.pharmacy during [[.pharmacy]]'s [[sunrise period]] was rejected (the name was given to the U.S.-based Merck & Co.)
| No*
| Deny
| No action taken
| No proper grounds for reconsideration. "In sum, ICANN correctly determined that the Registry had complied with Spec 11. As ICANN informed the Requester, registry operators may set their own criteria for resolving disputes in the circumstance where two legitimate trademark holders apply for the same second level domain."
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-16-14-lee-request-2016-12-16-en 16-14:] Fraser Lee
| [[Contractual Compliance]] closed Lee's complaint regarding ripoffreport.com, finding no violation of the [[Registrar Accreditation Agreement]]
| Yes
| Deny
| No action taken
| Summarily denied for failure to state a claim
|}
|}