14,932
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 200:
Line 200: + + + + + + + + + + + + − the reviewing of the Cooperative Engagement Process (CEP) was merged with the Independent Review Process – Implementation Oversight Team (IRP-IOT) in June 2017.+ +
Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability (view source)
Revision as of 22:19, 28 December 2021
, 2 years agono edit summary
* The team recommended a Framework of Interpretation for the ICANN Bylaw on Human Rights.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ccwg-acct-ws2-final-24jun18-en.pdf CCWG-ACCT Final Report pgs. 82-88]</ref>
* The team recommended a Framework of Interpretation for the ICANN Bylaw on Human Rights.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ccwg-acct-ws2-final-24jun18-en.pdf CCWG-ACCT Final Report pgs. 82-88]</ref>
===Jurisdiction===
===Jurisdiction===
* ICANN should be required to apply for and secure an OFAC license if the other party is otherwise qualified to be a registrar (and is not individually subject to sanctions). During the licensing process, ICANN should be helpful and transparent in the licensing process and communication with the potential registrar.
* ICANN should commit to applying for and securing an OFAC license for all applicants that would otherwise be approved (and are not on the specially designated nationals list).
* ICANN should clarify to registrars that their RAA with ICANN does not cause them to be required to comply with OFAC sanctions. ICANN
should explore various tools to remind registrars to understand their applicable laws and reflect those laws in their customer relationships.
* ICANN should pursue one or more OFAC general licenses. If unsuccessful, ICANN should find other ways to remove “friction” from
transactions between ICANN and residents of sanctioned countries.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ccwg-acct-ws2-final-24jun18-en.pdf CCWG-ACCT Final Report pgs. 96-97]</ref>
===Ombuds===
===Ombuds===
The Office of the Ombuds should
# Clarify the role and processes to manage expectations
# improve its standing and authority
# Strengthen independence
# Become more transparency
# Develop a Policy for non-dispute roles<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ccwg-acct-ws2-final-24jun18-en.pdf CCWG-ACCT Final Report pgs. 176-177]</ref>
=== Reviewing the Cooperative Engagement Process===
=== Reviewing the Cooperative Engagement Process===
* The reviewing of the Cooperative Engagement Process (CEP) was merged with the Independent Review Process – Implementation Oversight Team (IRP-IOT) in June 2017.
===SO/AC Accountability===
===SO/AC Accountability===
===Staff Accountability===
===Staff Accountability===
===Transparency===
===Transparency===