Changes

This session included a discussion on CSG priorities, namely:  

This session included a discussion on CSG priorities, namely:  

*The BC wants the recommendations to lower DNS abuse to be connected with the trigger to open the next round of new gTLDs. The ISPCPC does not support tying the two.

*The BC wants the recommendations to lower DNS abuse to be connected with the trigger to open the next round of new gTLDs. The ISPCPC does not support tying the two.

*The factions of the CSG all agree that [[ATRT3]] recommendations must move forward.  

*The factions of the CSG all agree that [[Accountability and Transparency Review Team|ATRT3]] recommendations must move forward.  

*DNS abuse is straining the CSG as a collective as the three subgroups do not agree on the significance of mitigating it and continue to focus on how to define it.

*DNS abuse is straining the CSG as a collective as the three subgroups do not agree on the significance of mitigating it and continue to focus on how to define it.

[[Jeffrey Bedser]] from the [[SSAC]] explained [[SAC115]] to the audience.  

[[Jeffrey Bedser]] from the [[SSAC]] explained [[SAC115]] to the audience.  

He gave credit to [[Suzanne Wolf]] for coming up with and/or emphasizing the need to find an interoperable solution for DNS abuse despite the differences in layers. <br/> The proposed framework outlines:

He gave credit to [[Suzanne Woolf]] for coming up with and/or emphasizing the need to find an interoperable solution for DNS abuse despite the differences in layers. <br/> The proposed framework outlines:

# Points of responsibility

# Points of responsibility

# Escalation paths in response to reporters sending complaints to the wrong point of responsibility

# Escalation paths in response to reporters sending complaints to the wrong point of responsibility